Tag archives: U.S. Supreme Court

COVID-19 Update: US Supreme Court decisions stay OSHA ETS, uphold CMS vaccine mandate

In a 6-3 decision handed down on Thursday, January 13, 2022, the US Supreme Court ordered a stay on the federal OSHA COVID “vaccine-or-test” Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS). The stay is predicated on the Court’s finding that the petitioners’ challenges to the ETS are likely to succeed and will remain in effect until a final … Continue reading

The Supreme Court resolves circuit split on FCA statute of limitations period

By Maxwell Karasek (US), Carol Poindexter (US) and Zach Smith (US) on May 14, 2019 Posted in Enforcement

On May 13, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously affirmed a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, holding that the False Claims Act’s (“FCA”) limitations period in 31 U.S.C.(b)(2) applies to “relator-initiated actions” in which the Government declines to intervene and that a relator in a nonintervened suit is not “the … Continue reading

Court applies Escobar, overturns $350M False Claims Act verdict

By on January 16, 2018 Posted in Enforcement

In Universal Health Services v. U.S. ex rel Escobar, the United States Supreme Court emphasized the importance of the materiality standard in False Claims Act cases. Since that decision, litigants have anxiously awaited further guidance on how Escobar’s instructions would be applied by lower courts. In U.S. ex rel Ruckh v. Salus Rehabilitation, LLC et … Continue reading

Judge doubles down on finding of materiality in FCA case

By Joseph Keillor (US) and Sarah Jean Kilker (US) on September 26, 2017 Posted in Enforcement

Federal courts continue to grapple with applying the “materiality” standard that is needed to cause a Stark Law violation or other underlying compliance matter to trigger False Claims Act liability. Although we have recently begun to gain a clearer view of what contractual requirements will not likely be viewed as material, at least one federal … Continue reading

U.S. Supreme Court to consider case involving pre-admission arbitration agreements

By Yvonne Puig (US) and Mark Faccenda (US) on November 1, 2016 Posted in Regulatory

On October 28, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court accepted review of a case involving the enforceability of pre-admission arbitration agreements. The case is brought by Kindred Nursing Centers, who filed a petition for writ of certiorari on July 1, 2016, challenging the Kentucky Supreme Court’s refusal to enforce the parties’ arbitration agreements on the basis … Continue reading