What is the current status of physician-assisted dying in Canada?
For most of Canada’s history, physician-assisted dying was a crime: sections 14 and 241(b) of the Criminal Code absolutely prohibited any person from assisting another person to commit suicide and provided that any person who violated this prohibition was liable to imprisonment for up to 14 years.

On February 6, 2015, things began to change. On that day, the Supreme Court of Canada (the “Court”) declared in Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5 that sections 14 and 241(b) of the Criminal Code are invalid to the extent that they prohibit physician-assisted dying for a competent adult person who:

  • clearly consents to the termination of life; and
  • has a grievous and irremediable medical condition (including an illness, disease or disability) that causes
    enduring suffering that is intolerable to the individual in the circumstances of his or her condition.

Importantly, however, the Court suspended its declaration of invalidity for 12 months (until February 6, 2016), to give Parliament and the provincial legislatures time to draft new, constitutional legislation governing physician-assisted dying.

On December 10, 2015, Quebec’s legislature responded to the Carter decision by enacting the Act respecting end-of-life care. Among other things, the Act respecting end-of-life care specifies the criteria that must be met for a person to obtain physician-assisted dying in Quebec and sets out special rules for institutions and professionals which provide end-of-life care in Quebec. To date, neither Parliament nor any other provincial legislature has enacted legislation governing physician-assisted dying.

On January 15, 2016, at Parliament’s request, the Court extended the suspension of its declaration of invalidity for a further 4 months (until June 6, 2016): see Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2016 SCC 4. However, to reduce the harm resulting from the extension, the Court granted two exemptions. The effect of these exemptions is that during the extension period (i.e. from now until June 6, 2016):

  • persons in Quebec may access physician-assisted dying in accordance with the provisions of the Act
    respecting end-of-life care; and
  • persons outside Quebec may access physician-assisted dying in accordance with the Carter decision, and
    with the approval of the superior court in their jurisdiction.

What’s next?
Neither Parliament nor the provincial legislatures are obligated to formulate a legislative response to the Carter decision. However, both would be wise to do so.

Ideally, Parliament should revise the Criminal Code to clarify the extent to which physician-assisted dying is criminal. To the extent that physician-assisted dying is not criminal, the provincial legislatures (which have jurisdiction to regulate health care) should enact legislation addressing, among other things:

  • whether physician-assisted dying will be publicly funded;
  • the criteria that must be met for a person to access physician-assisted dying (e.g. age, mental capacity,
  • the processes that will be used to evaluate whether a person has met the criteria to access physicianassisted
  • whether substitute decision-makers can consent to physician-assisted dying;
  • whether health care professionals other than physicians can provide assisted-dying;
  • whether health care providers and/or health care professionals can refuse to provide physician-assisted dying;
  • whether physician-assisted dying will be listed as the manner of death on medical certificates of death;
  • whether life insurance claims will be paid for deaths resulting from physician-assisted dying; and
  • whether and, if so, to what extent data will be collected about the use and administration of physician-assisted

The next part in this series will be posted on February 5, 2016 and will examine the issue of physician-assisted dying from the perspective of health care providers.